This is whats up with Africa
Death byWar
Death by disease
Death by starvation
Death by beasts of the field
Rev 6:2 And I saw,and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
Rev 6:3 And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see.
Rev 6:4 And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon, to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.
Rev 6:5 And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
Rev 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
Rev 6:7 And when he had opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth beast say, Come and see.
Rev 6:8 And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.?
It is not quite that simple because you also have to factor in what else is going on out there in ethereal land but it will get you started down the right direction as far as understanding what is going on.
You wanted to know were we are in biblical prophecy, people don't stay in denial too long because planet earth is coming down the pipe of Gods Judgement.
Saturday, July 16, 2005
Thursday, July 14, 2005
Recommendations on how to break the Flemo-crats blockade on Pres. Nominees to judiciary positions.
We are at a critical juncture in this stage of our history. I think it is time to bet the farm to get the particular type of judiciary the pres. Has been trying to nominate-that is primarily constitutionalist based judges.
This country desperately needs to return to court decisions based on the founding document and not on precedence. It is time to use the Democrats main weakness against them. The ole quid pro quo, something for something. A little compromise here(I hate that word) a little compromise there. Some arm twisting couldn't hurt.
Even the mainstream news media has seen the brundt of destruction of the constitution in the jailing of a news reporter recently. I think we may be able to expect a little help from them for the purpose of restoring our nation to form of Democracy envisioned in the original text.
If my links to articles worked right I would link the particular article I wrote last year but instead I think that what I will do is just cut and paste the whole thing right back here. It always amazes me when I go back in time and it is almost like reading someone else's writing . Am I really that good that I see even potential in my own squakings. Hmph. Well anyway here is the article.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Income Taxes are unconstitutional
Here is a site and an article concerning some rumors that I have been hearing lately. One of the rumors that I have heard is that the 16th amendment was not ratified. The other one now is that the Federal government is not apportioning the taxes collected properly. Another apparent conflict is that the 16th amendment looks to conflict with the original constitution.
I think these are valid arguments concerning my discourse about the fact that the Federal Government has not been following the constitution for over one hundred years and that may explain the reason why people have an underlying disrespect for our Government and country as a whole. I don't care how much people are lied to there is a point of discomfort with what our government is doing that goes beyond describing. I have no doubts that this is a root cause of G.B. having such a hard time with his efforts. Not that the people have any reason to doubt his desires but that he is not giving the things of the constitution proper attention and redress concerning the correct authorization and use of power by our Government. The people are right to feel that the Government we have today is not built on a rock solid foundation but on shifting sand so to speak and as such people though probably financially secure are not secure in any of their social life. Funny thing about it is people are exacerbating their insecurities by accumulating an ever increasing amount of debt. Maybe the pundits of old were right in the fact that the masses are like a herd animal being led to a slaughter. With that I give a hearty HA HA . Don't ask me to join y'all , that's all your own problems.
Many many times I have heard people say that they just don't know what the future may bring. I don't blame them when they are whipsawed back and forth between liberal dumbocrats and Republicans. By the way it is the blindocrats that got the 16th amendment passed and are the main offenders of the constitution as if we didn't already know that, and I have no doubts that Kerry, if he was to win would continue to insult the very document that would have gotten him the job in the most powerful nation in the world.
Here is another dichotomy. How can the U.S.A. profess it's ideals of Republic when it itself is not following it's own advice? Like I said people even though they may not have a conscious knowledge of what's going on, somewhere in their subconscious they know that things aren't right. So until another Ronald Reagan comes along and spells out what he is going to do and then does it or tries to do it, it won't matter whether it's a Demoncrat or a Republican in office they will experience (in the words of the great King James I and VI)nuthin but trouble.
Anyway here is an excerpt and a link to the article site. I think you may find it enlighteningFACT #10: Congress passed an Act in 1894 to impose a tax on the incomes of citizens and resident aliens of the United States. The constitutionality of the Act was challenged in 1895 and the Supreme Court said that the law was UNCONSTITUTIONAL because it was a DIRECT TAX that was not apportioned as the Constitution required. (see Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co., 157 US 429 [1895]).
This country desperately needs to return to court decisions based on the founding document and not on precedence. It is time to use the Democrats main weakness against them. The ole quid pro quo, something for something. A little compromise here(I hate that word) a little compromise there. Some arm twisting couldn't hurt.
Even the mainstream news media has seen the brundt of destruction of the constitution in the jailing of a news reporter recently. I think we may be able to expect a little help from them for the purpose of restoring our nation to form of Democracy envisioned in the original text.
If my links to articles worked right I would link the particular article I wrote last year but instead I think that what I will do is just cut and paste the whole thing right back here. It always amazes me when I go back in time and it is almost like reading someone else's writing . Am I really that good that I see even potential in my own squakings. Hmph. Well anyway here is the article.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Income Taxes are unconstitutional
Here is a site and an article concerning some rumors that I have been hearing lately. One of the rumors that I have heard is that the 16th amendment was not ratified. The other one now is that the Federal government is not apportioning the taxes collected properly. Another apparent conflict is that the 16th amendment looks to conflict with the original constitution.
I think these are valid arguments concerning my discourse about the fact that the Federal Government has not been following the constitution for over one hundred years and that may explain the reason why people have an underlying disrespect for our Government and country as a whole. I don't care how much people are lied to there is a point of discomfort with what our government is doing that goes beyond describing. I have no doubts that this is a root cause of G.B. having such a hard time with his efforts. Not that the people have any reason to doubt his desires but that he is not giving the things of the constitution proper attention and redress concerning the correct authorization and use of power by our Government. The people are right to feel that the Government we have today is not built on a rock solid foundation but on shifting sand so to speak and as such people though probably financially secure are not secure in any of their social life. Funny thing about it is people are exacerbating their insecurities by accumulating an ever increasing amount of debt. Maybe the pundits of old were right in the fact that the masses are like a herd animal being led to a slaughter. With that I give a hearty HA HA . Don't ask me to join y'all , that's all your own problems.
Many many times I have heard people say that they just don't know what the future may bring. I don't blame them when they are whipsawed back and forth between liberal dumbocrats and Republicans. By the way it is the blindocrats that got the 16th amendment passed and are the main offenders of the constitution as if we didn't already know that, and I have no doubts that Kerry, if he was to win would continue to insult the very document that would have gotten him the job in the most powerful nation in the world.
Here is another dichotomy. How can the U.S.A. profess it's ideals of Republic when it itself is not following it's own advice? Like I said people even though they may not have a conscious knowledge of what's going on, somewhere in their subconscious they know that things aren't right. So until another Ronald Reagan comes along and spells out what he is going to do and then does it or tries to do it, it won't matter whether it's a Demoncrat or a Republican in office they will experience (in the words of the great King James I and VI)nuthin but trouble.
Anyway here is an excerpt and a link to the article site. I think you may find it enlighteningFACT #10: Congress passed an Act in 1894 to impose a tax on the incomes of citizens and resident aliens of the United States. The constitutionality of the Act was challenged in 1895 and the Supreme Court said that the law was UNCONSTITUTIONAL because it was a DIRECT TAX that was not apportioned as the Constitution required. (see Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co., 157 US 429 [1895]).
I said this about a year ago
That the Constitution of the United States of America had been broken and here is some more evidence that the judicial system in this country knows it.
"Throughout our history as a state and as a nation the power to tax and to appropriate money exacted from the people has been considered as a strictly legislative power," Wormhoudt, now a member of the board of directors for the Institute for Justice, wrote. "[But] our Supreme Court's assumption of power, constitutionally assigned solely to the legislature with respect to school financing, is most unfortunate and clearly inconsistent with the foundations of a constitutional democracy."
From AFR(link on side bar).
"Throughout our history as a state and as a nation the power to tax and to appropriate money exacted from the people has been considered as a strictly legislative power," Wormhoudt, now a member of the board of directors for the Institute for Justice, wrote. "[But] our Supreme Court's assumption of power, constitutionally assigned solely to the legislature with respect to school financing, is most unfortunate and clearly inconsistent with the foundations of a constitutional democracy."
From AFR(link on side bar).
Sunday, July 10, 2005
Games
I play PC games in my spare time, mainly RTS or real time strategy games. The following are a few of the images from a game mod site of a game in the process of creation and I am looking forward to playing some day. Some of these game mods; this one in particular, are quite involved.
The craftmanship required is a delight to observe as well.
The craftmanship required is a delight to observe as well.
The Supreme Court's Job
Is not to unite the country. It is to defend the Constitution of the United States and to do it by upholding it. The President needs to throw strong constitutionalist based nominees at the congress until they acquiesce.
It takes courage to do so and that is what we expect out of our elected officials, but what Americans are getting is cowardice.
I see that a lot lately. Our country is filling up with a bunch of lilly livered chicken squats that at the first sign of resistance bwak down in favor of their God compromise.
This I say to them............bwak bwak buk buk buk bwak bwak. You say you didn't understand that. That's probably because I do not speak very good chicken. Disgusting language anyway.
It takes courage to do so and that is what we expect out of our elected officials, but what Americans are getting is cowardice.
I see that a lot lately. Our country is filling up with a bunch of lilly livered chicken squats that at the first sign of resistance bwak down in favor of their God compromise.
This I say to them............bwak bwak buk buk buk bwak bwak. You say you didn't understand that. That's probably because I do not speak very good chicken. Disgusting language anyway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
